1. Home
  2. Knowledge Base
  3. Tin Canny LearnDash Reporting
  4. Authoring Tools Supported by Tin Canny

The Tin Canny LearnDash Reporting plugin only supports e-learning modules authored with Storyline 2, Storyline 3, and Storyline 360, Articulate Rise, Adobe Captivate 9, Adobe Captivate 2017, iSpring 8, and H5P. See the following support matrix for details.

 Tin Can / xAPISCORM 1.2SCORM 2004
Articulate Storyline 2YesYesYes
Articulate Storyline 360YesYesYes
Articulate Storyline 3YesYesYes
Articulate Rise1N/AYesYes
Adobe Captivate 9YesYesYes
Adobe Captivate 2017YesYesYes
iSpring 82YesYesYes
H5PYesN/AN/A

Note if you try to upload an unsupported zip file, you’ll receive an error at the end of the upload process.

1 Articulate Rise modules will only send a Completed or Passed/Failed verb if they are displayed via Lightbox or a new window and upon closing the lightbox/window. When adding Rise modules, you should avoid using iFrame as the display method. Alternatively, you can override Completion Condition on the lesson or topic edit page by specifying other verbs such as “attempted” or “experienced” to trigger the Mark Complete button.

2 iSpring modules whose completion is based on viewing of slides will only send a Passed verb if the module is displayed via Lightbox or a new window and upon closing the lightbox/window. When adding iSpring modules, you should avoid using iFrame as the display method. Alternatively, you can override Completion Condition on the lesson or topic edit page by specifying other verbs such as “attempted” or “experienced” to trigger the Mark Complete button.

Was this article helpful?

12 replies
  1. joe
    joe says:

    Now that Articulate Rise fully exports in TinCan/xAPI mode, do the above conditions for Rise still exist? Or is uncanny owl fully compliant with Rise now?

    Reply
    • Ryan
      Ryan says:

      Tin Canny does support Tin Can/xAPI for Rise now, but there have been some minor issues with how Articulate did it (on their side). Right now we would still lean towards SCORM use; with Tin Canny there’s no real benefit to using Tin Can output instead. We convert the SCORM data to the Tin Can format we need anyway.

      Reply
  2. matt
    matt says:

    I’m using ispring but i want to use iframe. Im looking to record both ‘experienced’ and ‘passed’. Is there some other way to get around the lightbox/popup issue. Im thinking maybe add a ‘quiz’ to the last slide (just a question ‘i have finished the lesson checkbox’). Then the pass condition could be score rather than viewed slides and so i could use iframe. Would that work?

    Reply
    • Ryan
      Ryan says:

      I’m afraid it is not, at least not without a fair bit of custom development. You’re unfortunately the first person to request it, so it’s very unlikely that it’s something we’ll add support for.

      Reply
      • James Coate
        James Coate says:

        Hi Steve,

        Have you found a work around or solution to this issue?

        I experienced this same problem today, although a couple of weeks ago I successfully ran a Rise SCORM 1.2 course within the plugin just fine.

        The work around I have implemented today was to publish to Tin Can, but this doesn’t boast well for completion tracking. Fortunately in my case the course is for demonstration purposes only so it is not a major dilemma at this stage.

        Reply
        • Ryan
          Ryan says:

          Hi Steve,

          Sorry about the late reply; for any Tin Canny issues we are able to turn things around quickly when you send support tickets.

          Articulate has modified their Rise output a few times recently on us, in some cases major updates that have broken tracking in Tin Canny. Whenever they change their output we unfortunately have to scramble to figure out what they’re doing differently and adjust Tin Canny accordingly. Do try updating to the most recent version of Tin Canny, as we did make a few Rise changes–but some more updates are coming.

          Reply
  3. Andrew Lian
    Andrew Lian says:

    Hello
    It is good to see the authoring systems you are supporting. Are you supporting SCORM in Lectora (e.g. Inspire 17)? Or, if not, do you have plans for doing so? And, if so, do you have a timeline?

    Thanks for any information.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *